Comprehension

Click the question to reveal the answer

1. What initial problem does Aarav discover on the notice board?

A student’s name has been left out of the selected project list.

2. Why does Aarav feel uncertain about taking action?

Because the list was already approved and changing it could cause confusion or delay.

3. What careful step does Aarav take before speaking to the teacher?

He rereads the list and checks Neel’s project notes to confirm the mistake.

4. How does Aarav choose to communicate the issue?

He speaks privately and calmly with the teacher.

5. What is the immediate result of Aarav’s action?

The teacher verifies the mistake and corrects the notice.

6. What wider effect does this correction have on the class atmosphere?

The classroom becomes more respectful and supportive.

7. What does this sequence suggest about responsible leadership?

Responsible leadership involves careful thinking, respectful communication, and fairness even when action is difficult.

Vocabulary

What does the word “hesitated” suggest about Aarav’s feelings?
A) Confidence
B) Doubt or uncertainty
C) Anger
D) Excitement

B – It shows he was unsure about what he should do.

In the story, what is the closest meaning of “verified”?
A) Ignored
B) Questioned
C) Checked for truth
D) Announced loudly

C – The teacher confirmed the information was correct.

What does “atmosphere” refer to in the final paragraph?
A) The classroom air
B) The weather outside
C) The feeling among students
D) The building design

C – It describes the emotional environment in the class.

Inference

1. What does Aarav’s private conversation with the teacher reveal about his character?

It shows maturity and respect. He wants to correct the mistake without embarrassing anyone, which shows that he is thoughtful.

Author's Purpose

1. What central message does the story communicate to students?

That integrity requires courage, careful reasoning, and willingness to act for what is fair.

Grammar

1. In the sentence “While reviewing the list, he realised a name was missing,” what is the purpose of the opening clause?

It shows when Aarav made the discovery, adding detail to the main action.

2. Identify the conjunction in the sentence “The list was approved, but changing it might cause delay.”

But – It connects two contrasting ideas.

Writing

1. In about 100-120 words, evaluate whether Aarav made the best possible decision. Support your opinion with reasons from the story.

Aarav made the best possible decision because he balanced honesty with respect. Instead of ignoring the mistake or creating public embarrassment, he confirmed the facts and spoke privately to the teacher. This careful approach ensured fairness for Neel while maintaining trust in the classroom. Although correcting the list required extra effort, the final result improved the class atmosphere and showed the value of integrity. Aarav’s choice demonstrates that ethical leadership involves patience, thoughtful reasoning, and the courage to act when something is wrong, even if the situation feels uncomfortable or uncertain at first.

Listen to this story read aloud

Theme: Integrity, Fairness, Moral Courage

Advanced: The Notice Board Decision

Two weeks before the interschool science exhibition, Aarav was chosen to help organise the display materials for his class. One afternoon, while reviewing the list of selected projects on the school notice board, he realised that a name had been accidentally left out. The missing student, Neel, had worked for months on a model about water conservation, and many classmates had admired his effort.

Aarav hesitated. The final list had already been approved by a teacher, and changing it might create confusion or delay. However, ignoring the mistake felt unfair. He reread the list carefully to make sure he was correct, then decided to speak privately with the science teacher instead of pointing it out in front of others. Calmly, he explained what he had noticed and showed Neel’s project notes as proof.

After checking the records, the teacher thanked Aarav for his honesty and corrected the notice. Neel’s name was added, and the class reorganised the display to include his model. Although the change required extra effort from everyone, the atmosphere in the classroom became more respectful and supportive. Aarav understood that responsible decisions are not always easy, but fairness often depends on someone choosing to speak at the right moment.